Geological-logo
Geological-logo

Pioneering Women in Earth Science

From top left: Mary Anning, Marie Tharpe, Annie Alexander, Ingrid Christensen and Mathilde Wegger, Florence Bascom, Helen Belyea, Etheldred Bennett, Mary Buckland, Elizabeth Carne.

“Women Scientists Were Written Out of History” is an appropriate statement of introduction to this series on women geoscientists (quote from Susan Dominus, cited below). Evaluating the historical role that women played in emerging sciences is frequently plagued by a lack of written testimony, a problem that persisted well into the 20th century. Women might discover the first ichthyosaur (Mary Anning,1823-24), the molecular structure of DNA (Rosalind Franklin, 1953), or the Mid-Atlantic rift system (Marie Tharpe, 1953), but recognition was commonly ignored or relegated to footnotes or condescending remarks about their cleverness. One of the more telling anecdotes that epitomizes the social expectations of those times is the award of a Doctorate of Civil Law from the University of St. Petersberg to Etheldred Benett, promoted by Tsar Nicholas I of Russia and based on the quintessentially awkward assumption that Etheldred was a man.

Women were not permitted to publish scientific contributions (unless they were wealthy enough to self-publish), join scientific societies, or attend degree-granting colleges and universities until the late 19th to early 20th centuries. There were a few exceptions, such as Elizabeth Carne who published in the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall Transactions (1860-1875), and who also published in the London Quarterly Review under a male pseudonym. Elizabeth Agassiz also published jointly with her husband and later her son.. Frequently cited reasons for these strictures were fears of diluting the seriousness of scientific discourse, distracting the men from their learning, or the belief that women simply did not have the stamina for the rough and tumble of scientific debate. Unless diaries or correspondence were kept either by the women themselves or folk close to them, then historians are left guessing – were these pioneering women responsible for the ideas or interpretations, the collection, recording and analysis of data, the creative impulses that led to discovery, or were they just useful backdrops to a world dominated by the other 50%?

The last two to three decades have witnessed a surge in interest, and perhaps even a change in attitude towards the historical role that women played in emerging sciences. Mary Anning is feted in books and movies, and previously Hidden Figures have received recognition and accolades – often posthumously.

There are several ways to express the scientific, social, political, and religious contexts in which all these women lived and worked. The diagram below encapsulates a few of these events from the mid-15th to 20th centuries. To some extent the choice of items also expresses my own biases. The extent to which any of the women pioneers prior to the 20th C had access to knowledge of these events, particularly in the form of publications, is difficult to assess.

The biographies presented here are those relevant to the Earth sciences, primarily from the 17th to mid-20th centuries. They are brief, intended to introduce and direct readers to the more expansive and erudite accounts referenced.

[Initially, the list will be expanded alphabetically – I’ll eventually get to the W-X-Y-Zs. Other names and publication links will be added as they come to hand.]

Elizabeth Agassiz (1822-1907)

Annie Montague Alexander (1867-1950)

Mary Anning (1799-1847)

Florence Bascom (1862-1945)

Helen Belyea (1913-1986)

Etheldred Benett (1776–1845)

Martine Bertereau (1600 –1642)

Mary Buckland (1797-1857)

Elizabeth Carne (1817-1873)

Ingrid Christensen (1891- 1976)

A few general references and websites – (I will add more as they come to hand)

Marilyn Ogilvie, Joy Harvey (Ed.) 2000. The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science: Pioneering lives from ancient times to the mid-20th century. Volume 1, A-K. Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-92038-4, pp.  485–486.

Susan Dominus 2019.Women Scientists Were Written Out of History. It’s Margaret Rossiter’s Lifelong Mission to Fix That. Women in Science, Smithsonian Magazine.

Association for Women in Science Celebrating Pioneering Women In Science.

Ferwen: Letters from Gondwana.

History of Scientific Women

Max Plank Gesellschaft Women in science history.

Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford. Shout Out for Women in Science.

The Royal Society Pioneering Women.

U.S. National Science Foundation. Pioneering women in STEM.

Wikipedia. Timeline of women in science.

Archives
Categories
dip and strike compass
Measuring dip and strike
sandstone classification header
Classification of sandstones
Calcite cemented subarkose, Proterozoic Altyn Fm. southern Alberta
Sandstones in thin section
poles to bedding great circles
Stereographic projection – poles to planes
froude-reynolds-antidunes-header-768x439-1
Fluid flow: Froude and Reynolds numbers
Stokes Law for particle settling in a schematic context of other fluid flow functions
Fluid flow: Stokes Law and particle settling
sedimentary-basins-distribution-1-768x711
Classification of sedimentary basins
Model are representational descriptions are written in different languages - diagrammatic, descriptive, mathematical, and conceptual. They commonly contain variables and dimensionless quantities that permit quantitative analysis of the physical systems the models represent.
Geological models
Scroll to Top