Geological-logo
Geological-logo

Carbonates in thin section: Bryozoans

Devonian crinoid stems and disarticulated columnals in the bioclastic mix with fragmented fenestrate (f) and encrusting bryozoans (e).
Devonian crinoid stems and disarticulated columnals in the bioclastic mix with fragmented fenestrate (f) and encrusting bryozoans (e).

 

Bryozoa – are a complex but important group of reef and non-reef invertebrates and contributors to bioclastic sediment.

Bryozoa are an incredibly diverse group of metazoans with a geological record extending from Early Ordovician to Recent. There are more than 6000 extant species and probably 2-3 times that number of fossil species. They were once classified as plants, or moss animals, because in many cases that’s exactly what they look like. But they are metazoans, tiny as individuals (zooids, commonly less than 1 mm diameter), but as colonial organisms can construct sizeable, rigid mounds and thickets. The majority are marine; a small group, the order Ctenostomata are non-marine. Bryozoa are important contributors to bioclastic sediment in shallow, cool-temperate water depositional systems. The larger buildups also provide an ecological niche for other organisms.

The zooids are housed within structures built of calcium carbonate, chitin, or a mix of both; the solid skeletal structure of a colony is called a zoarium (pl. zoaria). The exoskeleton constructed by an individual zooid is called a zoecium (pl. zoecia). Most species secrete either calcite or aragonite exoskeletons. Only the carbonate forms have good preservation potential (so it’s worth keeping in mind the likelihood that in fossil bryozoan assemblages there will probably be “missing” species). Many species contain a mix of calcite and aragonite. For modern bryozoans the proportion that secretes aragonite is greatest in tropical realms, generally decreasing in cooler waters at higher latitudes. The Mg content of calcites is also highly variable, ranging from 0 to 16 (mol)% (Smith, 2014 – for a review of some modern bryozoans).

Common forms range from low relief encrusters on bedrock, shells, and seaweed, to rigid frameworks and thickets that are delicately or robustly branched (some coral-like), palmate (shaped like a palm tree), or fenestrate (window-like) and lacy, anastomosing sheets, massive domes, and even corkscrew structures commonly labelled as Archimedes screws. Colonies a few centimetres long may house a million and more zooids.

A few of the common bryozoa forms. Each form has a 3-dimensional aspect that can potentially create large (decimetre-scale), complex structures. Individual skeletal cavities – zoecium – are indicated. In fenestrate forms, the (relatively) large openings in the zoarium do not accommodate the living animal; however, they can be filled with sediment and cements as is the case for the zoecia (see the images below).
A few of the common bryozoa forms. Each form has a 3-dimensional aspect that can potentially create large (decimetre-scale), complex structures. Individual skeletal cavities – zoecium – are indicated. In fenestrate forms, the (relatively) large openings in the zoarium do not accommodate the living animal; however, they can be filled with sediment and cements as is the case for the zoecia (see the images below).

Secretion of calcium carbonate confers a degree of rigidity to bryozoa, but in the grand scheme of sediment production and dispersal, they are relatively delicate structures. This is particularly the case for delicately branched and sheet or plate-like zoaria. As fragments in grainstones and rudstones, their identification even to the level of bryozoan order can be difficult. In thin section, fragment identifications generally rely on a relatively ordered arrangement of zoecium that are regularly spaced and of similar size and shape. Note that the size and shape of the zoecium may change as the orientation of the fragment changes.

Modern bryozoa encrusting a gastropod. The zooids are arranged in a brick-like pattern. Hahei, NZ.
Modern bryozoa encrusting a gastropod. The zooids are arranged in a brick-like pattern. Hahei, NZ.

 

Modern rigid, calcareous branched bryozoa. Zoom in to see the zooids along each branch. Specimen is from Florida Keys.
Modern rigid, calcareous branched bryozoa. Zoom in to see the zooids along each branch. Specimen is from Florida Keys.

Differentiation from some other phyla

Corals:

  • The corallites of solitary or colonial corals are significantly larger than bryozoan zoecium
  • Corals are composed of aragonite, that in most cases will recrystallize to low magnesium calcite during burial diagenesis.
  • Corallites have well defined internal structure, founded on septa (vertical plates of aragonite) that radiate from a central column – zoecia have no such internal structure.

Barnacle plates:

  • Basal sections of barnacle plates commonly show an array of large pores that resemble bryozoan zoaria. However, the barnacle fragment may also show its characteristic plicate layered structure. Bryozoa exoskeletons have no well-defined layering.

Echinoderms plates:

  • There is a superficial resemblance between fenestrate bryozoa and perforated echinoderm plates, where pores in the latter are commonly arranged linearly or in quasi-radial patterns. Echinoderm plates also consist of a single calcite crystal – this will show as uniform extinction across the entire plate. Bryozoa plates consist of a myriad, microscopic acicular crystals that during diagenesis will recrystallize to calcite spar.
Cross section through a Cheilostome bryozoan colony. Note the change in zoarium shape and size as the orientation across the sample changes from mostly longitudinal (left – plain polarized light) to transverse (right – crossed polars). The zoecia have been filled with drusy calcite cement.
Cross section through a Cheilostome bryozoan colony. Note the change in zoarium shape and size as the orientation across the sample changes from mostly longitudinal (left – plain polarized light) to transverse (right – crossed polars). The zoecia have been filled with drusy calcite cement.

 

An abraded fragment of modern, lacey or platy bryozoa showing variable zoecium size (average 200 μm zoecium width) and shape. Zoecia walls are constructed with fibrous aragonite crystals that, in the expanded view (right - crossed polars), are crudely aligned parallel to zoecia walls. Offshore Three Kings Islands, northern (subtropical) New Zealand, about 30 m depth.
An abraded fragment of modern, lacy or platy bryozoa showing variable zoecium size (average 200 μm zoecium width) and shape. Zoecia walls are constructed with fibrous aragonite crystals that, in the expanded view (right – crossed polars), are crudely aligned parallel to zoecia walls. Offshore Three Kings Islands, northern (subtropical) New Zealand, about 30 m depth.

 

Two kinds of bryozoa from recent bioclastic sediment, Three Kings Islands (northern New Zealand): Plate-like forms (p), and a single form with anastomosing zoecia walls (a) - Note the micron-sized pores in this specimen. For contrast, the solitary corallite (c) is an order of magnitude larger than the zoecia and shows the typical radial disposition of septa (partly sediment filled). Right image shows the anastomosing bryozoa in greater detail. Plain polarized light.
Two kinds of bryozoa from recent bioclastic sediment, Three Kings Islands (northern New Zealand): Plate-like forms (p), and a single form with anastomosing zoecia walls (a) – Note the micron-sized pores in this specimen. For contrast, the solitary corallite (c) is an order of magnitude larger than the zoecia and shows the typical radial disposition of septa (partly sediment filled). Right image shows the anastomosing bryozoa in greater detail. Plain polarized light.

 

An Oligocene bryozoa-dominated limestone. There are numerous longitudinal ((bl) and transverse (bt) sections through the bryozoa fragments. In the bioclastic mix are a couple of foraminifera, the planispiral form (centre) partly filled with glauconite. There are also a few abraded echinoderm plates (e) that are encased in syntaxial calcite cement. Left: plain polarized light; Right: crossed polars.
An Oligocene bryozoa-dominated limestone. There are numerous longitudinal ((bl) and transverse (bt) sections through the bryozoa fragments. In the bioclastic mix are a couple of foraminifera, the planispiral form (centre) partly filled with glauconite. There are also a few abraded echinoderm plates (e) that are encased in syntaxial calcite cement. Left: plain polarized light; Right: crossed polars.

 

Oligocene Awakino limestone dominated by bryozoa, including a specimen showing good palmate structure (p – a longitudinal view) where individual tubes splay upwards. In the bioclastic mix are a few small foraminifera and small fragmented echinoderm plates. Plain polarized light.
Oligocene Awakino limestone dominated by bryozoa, including a specimen showing good palmate structure (p – a longitudinal view) where individual tubes splay upwards. In the bioclastic mix are a few small foraminifera and small fragmented echinoderm plates. Plain polarized light.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to Kirsty Vincent, Earth Sciences, Waikato University for access to the petrographic microscope.

 

Other posts in this series

Brachiopod morphology for sedimentologists

Bivalve shell morphology for sedimentologists

Gastropod shell morphology for sedimentologists

Cephalopod morphology for sedimentologists

Optical mineralogy: Some terminology

Carbonates in thin section: Echinoderms and barnacles

Carbonates in thin section: Molluscan bioclasts

Carbonates in thin section: Forams and sponges

Neomorphic textures in thin section

Sandstones in thin section

Greywackes in thin section

Mineralogy of carbonates; skeletal grains

Bivalve morphology for sedimentologists

Mineralogy of carbonates; non-skeletal grains

Mineralogy of carbonates; lime mud

Mineralogy of carbonates; classification

Mineralogy of carbonates; carbonate factories

Mineralogy of carbonates; basic geochemistry

Mineralogy of carbonates; cements

Mineralogy of carbonates; sea floor diagenesis

Mineralogy of carbonates; Beachrock

Mineralogy of carbonates; deep sea diagenesis

Mineralogy of carbonates; meteoric hydrogeology

Mineralogy of carbonates; Karst

Mineralogy of carbonates; Burial diagenesis

Mineralogy of carbonates; Neomorphism

Mineralogy of carbonates; Pressure solution

Mineralogy of carbonates: Stromatolite reefs

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives
Categories
dip and strike compass
Measuring dip and strike
sandstone classification header
Classification of sandstones
Calcite cemented subarkose, Proterozoic Altyn Fm. southern Alberta
Sandstones in thin section
poles to bedding great circles
Stereographic projection – poles to planes
froude-reynolds-antidunes-header-768x439-1
Fluid flow: Froude and Reynolds numbers
Stokes Law for particle settling in a schematic context of other fluid flow functions
Fluid flow: Stokes Law and particle settling
sedimentary-basins-distribution-1-768x711
Classification of sedimentary basins
Model are representational descriptions are written in different languages - diagrammatic, descriptive, mathematical, and conceptual. They commonly contain variables and dimensionless quantities that permit quantitative analysis of the physical systems the models represent.
Geological models
Recent Posts
alice wilson with hammer
Alice Wilson (1881-1964)
Madeleine Fritz in the field
Madeleine Fritz (1896 -1990)
Eunice-Foote-paper-title-1024x404
Eunice Foote (1819–1888)
Regina Fleszarowa
Regina Fleszarowa (1888-1969)
gertrude elles at the outcrop
Gertrude Lilian Elles (1872-1960)
Scroll to Top