Geological-logo
Geological-logo

Trilobite morphology for sedimentologists

A montage of some trilobite specimens used in this article

Common trilobite characteristics to help with identification in outcrop and core

Next to the dinosaurs, trilobites are amongst the most recognizable of any group of fossils. They frequently are destined for collections, even with those who have only a passing interest in paleontology. Trilobites define the second stage of the Early Cambrian, beginning 529 million years ago, as full participants in the great explosion of invertebrate critters (the base of the Cambrian is 541 Ma.). They also contribute to the mystery of the Cambrian explosion because they appeared as fully formed arthropods with well-developed segmentation, appendages, complex eyes, and hard protective carapaces. Their precursors probably evolved during the Ediacaran (latest Precambrian) and earliest Cambrian, but what form these ancestral animals took is a problem that awaits solid resolution.

Trilobites are one of the most diverse of all fossilized invertebrates. The number of species burgeoned through the Cambrian and Ordovician, but by the Devonian were depleted by successive extinction events, niche competition, and predation by voracious Placoderms (common Devonian bony fish). The great Permian extinction saw their last gasp. Trilobites were one of the few invertebrate groups to survive almost the entire Paleozoic.

Trilobites secreted a calcium carbonate carapace – this is the preservable part that provides us with a faithful copy of their anatomy. It seems that, like many other arthropods, they shed this carapace at regular intervals (also called molting). Thus, a single critter could produce several exoskeletons, increasing its preservation potential. Overall lengths range from a few millimetres to about half a metre, but most were 5-8 cm long or less.

Most trilobites crawled along the sea floor, probably scavenging for food along the way. With so many legs, all working in unison, it’s not surprising that they left evidence of their activity as fossil traces. A common trace is Cruziana, that consists of bilobed, herringbone-like grooves excavated by the movement of pairs of legs.

The bilobed, herringbone pattern typical of the trace fossil Cruziana, commonly (but not always) associated with trilobite movement across a muddy substrate. Image credit: Luis Fernández García, Wikimedia.
The bilobed, herringbone pattern typical of the trace fossil Cruziana, commonly (but not always) associated with trilobite movement across a muddy substrate. Image credit: Luis Fernández García, Wikimedia.

Other sources of information

American Museum of Natural History, Trilobite Website

Sam Gon’s excellent website – A Guide to the Orders of Trilobites provides lots of detail

 

Image credits: Several of the photographs were taken and generously donated by Annette Lokier, University of Derby (indicated on each image).

 

Trilobite orientation

The upper surface that contains the carapace is dorsal; this is the view we usually see in outcrop and hand specimen. The softer underside is ventral; in life this was the side closest to the substrate. The tail (pygidium) margin is posterior and the head (cephalon) margin anterior.

The tri-lobed character of trilobites is defined by a central, longitudinal axial lobe flanked by two marginal or pleural lobes. Thus, there is an (imaginary) axis of bilateral symmetry through the centre such that one half of a trilobite is the mirror image of the other. These are designated left and right pleural lobes when viewing a specimen with the tail down (or closest to you) and anterior up.

Left: An outline of the main components of a trilobite carapace and its bilateral symmetry, sketched from a photo of Arctinurus boltoni. Right: For comparison an image of a Middle Cambrian Olenoides, from Utah (American Museum of Natural History collection). It is 9cm long.
Left: An outline of the main components of a trilobite carapace and its bilateral symmetry, sketched from a photo of Arctinurus boltoni. Right: For comparison an image of a Middle Cambrian Olenoides, from Utah (American Museum of Natural History collection). It is 9cm long.

Carapace morphology

All arthropods are segmented. For the trilobites this includes a cephalon (the head), thorax, and pygidium (equivalent to an abdomen). Each is segmented, although in the cephalon and pygidium these segments are fused together.  Segments in the thorax were moveable providing flexibility as the animal crawled over uneven substrates and obstacles or rolled into a ball for protection.

Same critters as the image above, showing the commonly preserved elements of trilobite carapace morphology.
Same critters as the image above, showing the commonly preserved elements of trilobite carapace morphology.

Trilobite heads, from one taxon to another, are much the same size (about a third to a quarter the total trilobite length) and are generally wider than the thorax. Pygidia on the other hand vary considerably in size relative to the cephalon, ranging from millimeters to larger than the associated cephalon. Some examples are shown below. At one extreme, the genus Agnostus has subequal pygidium and cephalon (referred to as isopygous) – it also has only 2 segments in its thorax – apparently Agnostus was blind). In contrast, the common Ordovician genus Calymene had a much smaller pygidium (it is micropygous).

Differentiation of the cephalon, thorax and pygidium in three different trilobite taxa. Left: A Cambrian, isopygous Agnostus species; there are only two thoracic segments in this genus. Middle: A subisopygous Ptychoparia. Right: Calymene a common Silurian genus characterised by a very small pygidium that in this specimen is curled under the thorax. All photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.
Differentiation of the cephalon, thorax and pygidium in three different trilobite taxa. Left: A Cambrian, isopygous Agnostus; there are only two thoracic segments in this genus. Middle: A subisopygous Ptychoparia. Right: Calymene, a common Silurian genus characterised by a very small pygidium that in this specimen is curled under the thorax. All photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.

 

Flexibility among the thorax segments allowed trilobites to assume certain bodily contortions, the most important being an ability to roll into a protective ball. This example of Calymene contortion shows a pygidium view (left) and a cephalon view – in the latter the two eyes are clearly visible. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.
Flexibility among the thorax segments allowed trilobites to assume certain bodily contortions, the most important being an ability to roll into a protective ball. This example of Calymene contortion shows a pygidium view (left) and a cephalon view – in the latter the two eyes are clearly visible. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.

Cephalon

Commonly recognized features of the cephalon include:

  • The facial suture which allowed the main part of the carapace to separate from the head during molting. That part of the carapace outside the facial suture – the free cheeks – could be detached, leaving the fixed cheeks
  • A central lobe oriented longitudinally called the glabella, that divided the head bilaterally.
  • Compound eyes on either side of the glabella. Trilobite eyes were some of the most sophisticated ever to evolve in arthropods. Each eye contained multiple lenses (hundreds of lenses in some taxa), each lens consisting of a single, prismatic calcite crystal. The geometrical disposition of the lenses permitted an almost 360° field of view.
  • Genal spine: Usually at the posterior, outer edge of the cephalon, as part of the free cheeks. Spines may be short and stubby or extend almost the entire length of the thorax.
Left: This rolled Calymene specimen contains an excellent view of a compound eye and its individual lenses. Right: Cephalon of the genus Onnia (Mid-Upper Ordovician) show the arrangement of the eyes and central glabella. The apron around the cephalon margin contains concentrically organized pits. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.
Left: This rolled Calymene specimen contains an excellent view of a compound eye and its individual lenses. Right: Cephalon of the genus Onnia (Mid-Upper Ordovician) show the arrangement of the eyes and central glabella. The apron around the cephalon margin contains concentrically organized pits. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.

 

A discombobulated Dalmanites carapace, separated into a pygidium and cephalon. The cephalon contains a concentric eye ridge, furrowed glabella, and a prominent genial spine. Photo courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.
A discombobulated Dalmanites carapace, separated into a pygidium and cephalon. The cephalon contains a concentric eye ridge, furrowed glabella, and a prominent genial spine. Photo courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.

Thorax

This is the flexible part of the animal made up of overlapping segments, or pleurae, each attached to an axial ring in the central axial lobe. Linkages between the cephalon and pygidium were also flexible.

Left: Phacops is a common Silurian through Devonian genus. The pygidium and lower part of the thorax are in this specimen are curled ventrally. The thorax contains at least 14 segments. Right: This Ptychoparia is a good example of the bilateral symmetry of pleural lobes about the central axial lobe. The thorax has 15 segments. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.
Left: Phacops is a common Silurian through Devonian genus. The pygidium and lower part of the thorax are in this specimen are curled ventrally. The thorax contains at least 14 segments. Right: This Ptychoparia is a good example of the bilateral symmetry of pleural lobes about the central axial lobe. The thorax has 15 segments. Photos courtesy of Annette Lokier, University of Derby.

A complete thoracic segment consists of pleura on either side of the axial lobe. Each segment contained a pair of legs, protected in part by the plurae; trilobite legs were never calcified and hence rarely preserved. The genus Agnostus has only two segments. Many species have 10-15 segments like the examples illustrated here; a few have several dozen segments.

The outer margins of plurae frequently culminated in spines. There is still debate over their purpose – were they grown for protection, or to assist with locomotion? In some species the spines also grew from the upper surface of the thorax, rather than the margin.

 

Pygidium

The tail end of the carapace also consists of pleural and axial ring segments but they are fused1 and therefore inflexible. These pygidial segments also contained pairs of legs that extended from beneath the carapace. The outer margins of each segment were frequently adorned with spines.

 

Other posts in this series

Bivalve shell morphology for sedimentologists

Gastropod shell morphology for sedimentologists

Cephalopod morphology for sedimentologists

Brachiopod morphology for sedimentologists

Echinoderm morphology for sedimentologists

Carbonates in thin section: Forams and Sponges

Carbonates in thin section: Bryozoans

Carbonates in thin section: Echinoderms and barnacles

Carbonates in thin section: Molluscan bioclasts

Neomorphic textures in thin section

Mineralogy of carbonates; skeletal grains

Mineralogy of carbonates; non-skeletal grains

Mineralogy of carbonates; lime mud

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives
Categories
dip and strike compass
Measuring dip and strike
sandstone classification header
Classification of sandstones
Calcite cemented subarkose, Proterozoic Altyn Fm. southern Alberta
Sandstones in thin section
poles to bedding great circles
Stereographic projection – poles to planes
froude-reynolds-antidunes-header-768x439-1
Fluid flow: Froude and Reynolds numbers
Stokes Law for particle settling in a schematic context of other fluid flow functions
Fluid flow: Stokes Law and particle settling
sedimentary-basins-distribution-1-768x711
Classification of sedimentary basins
Model are representational descriptions are written in different languages - diagrammatic, descriptive, mathematical, and conceptual. They commonly contain variables and dimensionless quantities that permit quantitative analysis of the physical systems the models represent.
Geological models
Recent Posts
alice wilson with hammer
Alice Wilson (1881-1964)
Madeleine Fritz in the field
Madeleine Fritz (1896 -1990)
Eunice-Foote-paper-title-1024x404
Eunice Foote (1819–1888)
Regina Fleszarowa
Regina Fleszarowa (1888-1969)
gertrude elles at the outcrop
Gertrude Lilian Elles (1872-1960)
Scroll to Top