Geological-logo
Geological-logo

Strike-slip faults – some terminology

An oblique view of Alpine Fault from the International Space Station. The master fault is a prominent linear feature immediately left of the snow line (black arrow, bottom). The intersection of splay faults that trend northeast indicated by black dots. The fault splays are clearly delineated by valleys. Image Credit: NASA ISS006E39488
An oblique view of Alpine Fault from the International Space Station. The master fault is a prominent linear feature immediately left of the snow line (black arrow, bottom). The intersection of splay faults that trend northeast indicated by black dots. The fault splays are clearly delineated by valleys. Image Credit: NASA ISS006E39488

 

In 1940 Harold Wellman and Dick Willett proposed that two groups of rocks at either end of the South Island of New Zealand, each having the same stratigraphic and lithologic characteristics, were at one time a single unit. The dislocation was the result of 600 km lateral shift along a major fault. This was pre-plate tectonics. The consensus at the time was that crustal movements were dominated by vertical displacements. Wellman’s hypothesis turned a few heads and invited its share of derision. But he was right… Jumping ahead a few years (and encapsulating several decades of science history in a single sentence), we now know this fault as the Alpine Fault, a dextral, or right-lateral transform strike-slip fault that also doubles as the boundary between the Pacific and Australian plates.

 

The right-lateral Alpine Fault transform and its strike-slip fault splays (Marlborough fault system), in the context of other plate tectonic elements: the Hikurangi subduction zone that is linked to Alpine Fault via Hope Fault; and the subduction zone at the south end of South Island where oceanic crust of the Australian Plate is subducting beneath the Pacific plate (opposite polarity to Hikurangi). Pacific plate trajectories at Hikurangi margin become increasingly oblique from north to south. The present trajectory along Alpine Fault is also transpressional. Base map from NIWA.
The right-lateral Alpine Fault transform and its strike-slip fault splays (Marlborough fault system), in the context of other plate tectonic elements: the Hikurangi subduction zone that is linked to Alpine Fault via Hope Fault; and the subduction zone at the south end of South Island where oceanic crust of the Australian Plate is subducting beneath the Pacific plate (opposite polarity to Hikurangi). Pacific plate trajectories at Hikurangi margin become increasingly oblique from north to south. The present trajectory along Alpine Fault is also transpressional. Base map from NIWA. Information from various sources.

Strike-slip faults occur in most plate tectonic settings, primarily at plate boundaries (like most other fault types). They form in oceanic and continental crust/lithosphere. The characteristic zig zag dismembering of mid-ocean spreading ridges is caused by ridge transforms that accommodate the strain from oblique spreading. Convergent margins with oblique plate trajectories will also generate strike-slip faults in accretionary prisms, forearcs and backarcs.

Our understanding of strike-slip faults has advanced with detailed field mapping, subsurface imaging, and numerical and analogue modelling. Strike-slip faults do not occur in isolation; they come with a bevy of subsidiary structures that reflect the associated extensional and contractional stresses. In fact, it is these “minor” structures that frequently allow us to decipher the tectonic and kinematic history of such faults.

Common strike-slip structures are illustrated in the following diagrams and definitions. Most have been borrowed and modified from important papers and texts on the subject: Biddle and Christie-Blick, 1985 (Intro to SEPM volume – PDF available); Sylvester, 1988 – (PDF); Nilsen and Sylvester, 1999 (PDF); Davis and Reynolds, 1996 (an excellent text); Allen and Allen, 2005, 2013.

You are invited to look at two other posts on faults –  Thrust faults, and more general Terminology of faults. There is a companion post of Basins formed by strike-slip tectonics

 

Some common definitions

Some of the more common structures associated with strike-slip faults. An idealized array modified from Biddle and Christie-Blick, 1985, Fig.3.
Some of the more common structures associated with strike-slip faults. An idealized array modified from Biddle and Christie-Blick, 1985, Fig.3.

Antithetic faults: Subsidiary or minor faults that have a sense of displacement opposite that of a master fault or principal deformation zone. They occur in extensional regimes (such as accommodation in the hanging wall of listric faults), compressional regimes as back-thrusts, and strike-slip faults. Opposing subsidiary structures are synthetic where the displacement has the same shear sense as the master fault. Antithetic and synthetic faults commonly occur in parallel arrays. Cf. Riedel shears.

 

Conjugate Riedel shears: See Riedel shears.

Conjugate faults: Fault pairs where the fault planes intersect at (commonly) 60o such that the direction of minimum extension bisects this angle, and the direction of maximum extension bisects the obtuse angle (~120o). Conjugate faults occur in dip-slip and strike-slip structural domains.

 

En echelon folds: Anticline-syncline pairs that in an ideal system will be about 45o to the PDZ. Fold axes parallel the long axis of the strain ellipse – the axis of maximum extension, and bisect the angle between Riedel and conjugate Riedel shears. Fold axes will also be at right angles to extensional normal faults.

 

Flower structures: Characteristic fault splays that develop at restraining and releasing bends, and at stepovers of strike-slip faults. Strain is concentrated at these locations along the fault plane so that movement along the main fault is transferred to a secondary fault; this process can be repeated several times, producing fault splays that in 3-dimensions, merge with the master fault. These splays are also called strike-slip duplexes.  Flower structure refers to the cross-sectional view of duplexes. In positive flower structures (also called palm tree structures), the displacement is predominantly reverse (transpressional); in transtensional environments the displacement is normal dip slip in cross-section – these are negative flower structures or tulip structures. However, the sense of displacement can change up fault plane dip and along strike.

 

Normal faults/Tension gashes: Normal faults are expected at releasing bends and stepovers. On the strain ellipse, fault plane strike is normal to the axes of en echelon folds and parallel to the compressional axis.

 

Principal displacement zone – PDZ: The zone or plane of dip-slip or strike-slip that accounts for greatest proportion of accumulated strain. Subsidiary structures such as synthetic and antithetic faults and folds (e.g., fault splays, back-thrusts, fracture zones, en echelon folds) will be kinematically linked to the PDZ.

 

Releasing bend: Strike-slip motion at a bend in the PDZ that produces extensional structures. Pull-apart, or strike-slip basins are commonly developed at releasing bends. The left or right handedness of bends is determined by looking along the trend or strike of the fault – if the bend moves to the left, it is a left bend. Thus, a full description of the fault bend might be left-handed/releasing/sinistral or left-lateral strike-slip fault. Cf. Restraining bend, stepover.

Restraining bend: Strike-slip motion at a bend in the PDZ that produces compressional structures such as thrusts and pop-up ridges. The left or right handedness of bends is determined by looking along the trend or strike of the fault – if the bend moves to the left, it is a left bend. Cf. Releasing bend, stepover.

 

Map and 3D block views of strike-slip duplexes and flower structure growth at fault bends and stepovers. Duplexes begin as a single fault strand that, as displacement continues, distributes strain progressively to new fault strands. The resulting ‘horses’ are analogous to those developed in thrust fault duplexes. Negative flower structures form at releasing bends/stepovers; positive flower structures within restraining geometries. The rules for naming left or right handedness are described below. Modified in part from Davis and Reynolds, 1996; Twiss R.J. and Moores E.M.; 1992: Structural geology. W.H. Freeman and C., New York, 532 pp.
Map and 3D block views of strike-slip duplexes and flower structure growth at fault bends and stepovers. Duplexes begin as a single fault strand that, as displacement continues, distributes strain progressively to new fault strands. The resulting ‘horses’ are analogous to those developed in thrust fault duplexes. Negative flower structures form at releasing bends/stepovers; positive flower structures within restraining geometries. The rules for naming left or right handedness are described below. Modified in part from Davis and Reynolds, 1996; Twiss R.J. and Moores E.M.; 1992: Structural geology. W.H. Freeman and C., New York, 532 pp.

Ridge transform:  Transform faults that segment oceanic spreading ridges; they accommodate oblique spreading. Associated ridge fracture zones represent inactive ridge transforms.

Riedel shears: Parallel arrays of faults that form during the early stages of strike-slip formation. They are oriented at low angles to the principal displacement zone, commonly about 15o, and are synthetic to the PDZ. As deformation continues the Riedel shears become linked and part of the PDZ. A second set of faults at about 75o to the PDZ are conjugate to the Riedel shears and antithetic to the PDZ. The line bisecting the conjugate set parallels the direction of principal stress (on a strain ellipse this is the long axis); it also parallels the axes of en echelon folds. A third set of shears, P shears, at 10o and less to the PDZ, may form after the Riedel shears, and link with them to form the PDZ.

 

The strain ellipse is a convenient way to show the relationship between structure and the principal axes of extension and compression, with respect to the master fault (PDZ). There are two terminological conventions: the general terms synthetic – antithetic apply to almost any conjugate fault system; the Riedel shear terms apply specifically to strike-slip faults. The examples here are for right-lateral strike-slip displacements. Modified from Biddle and Christie-block, 1985; Allen and Allen, 2013.
The strain ellipse is a convenient way to show the relationship between structure and the principal axes of extension and compression, with respect to the master fault (PDZ). There are two terminological conventions: the general terms synthetic – antithetic apply to almost any conjugate fault system; the Riedel shear terms apply specifically to strike-slip faults. The examples here are for right-lateral strike-slip displacements. Modified from Biddle and Christie-block, 1985; Allen and Allen, 2013.

Stepovers: A stepover occurs where the strain at the end of one fault is transferred to the beginning of a parallel fault having the same sense of displacement. Stepovers can be restraining or releasing. They are also described as left or right in the same way that bends are described; at the end of one fault, you look right or left to find its parallel accomplice. Pull-apart basins and pop-up ridges can also form at stepovers depending on whether they are restraining or releasing.

 

A mini-example of right-lateral strike-slip deformation associated with the 1984 earthquake on Calveras Fault at Hollister; the fault is a major splay of the San Andreas transform. Tension gashes formed in the pavement have a broadly en echelon, sigmoidal orientation, and appear to be offset at a pop-up step over – the inset left is a sketch of the interpreted structures. This photo taken in 1988.
A mini-example of right-lateral strike-slip deformation associated with the 1984 earthquake on Calveras Fault at Hollister; the fault is a major splay of the San Andreas transform. Tension gashes formed in the pavement have a broadly en echelon, sigmoidal orientation, and appear to be offset at a pop-up step over – the inset left is a sketch of the interpreted structures. This photo taken in 1988.

Strike-slip/pull-apart/wrench basins: Elongate, rhomboid- or sinusoidal-shaped basins formed at releasing bends and stepovers of strike-slip faults. They are relatively small basins compared with passive margins and foreland basins, but they have high aspect ratios – depth to areal extent and can accommodate many kilometres of sediment fill. Sediment composition may change over the life of a strike-slip basin because of lateral shifts in source rock.

Synthetic faults: See antithetic fault

 

Tear faults: These faults basically accommodate differential movement or strain within large fault blocks. They occur mainly in normal and reverse-thrust fault systems.

Transcurrent faults: Major strike-slip faults that are generally confined to thin-skinned crustal deformation. Cf. Transform faults.

Transfer faults: Strike-slip faults at various scales that transfer dip-slip motion from one fault block to another. They are common in extensional-rift regimes and thrust systems.

Transform faults: Strike-slip faults that form plate boundaries, and therefore extend through the lithosphere. They can form in continental lithosphere (e.g., San Andreas Fault in California; Alpine Fault in New Zealand), or oceanic lithosphere (ridge transforms). They are kinematically linked to and terminate at other plate boundaries – spreading ridges, subduction zones, or other transforms.

Transpression: A combination of strike-slip (dominant) and convergence developed at convergent plate boundaries.

Transtension:  A combination of strike-slip (dominant) and extension; also called oblique slip. Most major strike-slip faults have a component of transtension or transpression. Transtension is developed at divergent plate boundaries (continental or oceanic rifts) and extensional components of orogenic belts.

 

Other posts in this series on Common Structure and Mapping Problems

Measuring dip and strike

Solving the three-point problem

Stereographic projection – the basics

Stereographic projection of linear measurements

Stereographic projection – unfolding folds

Stereographic projection – poles to planes

The Rule of Vs in geological mapping

Folded rock; some terminology

Using S and Z folds to decipher large-scale structures

Cleavage and cleavage-bedding intersections

The kinematics of deformed rock

Faults: Some common terminology

Accretionary prisms and forearc basins

Thrust faults: Some common terminology

Basins formed by strike-slip tectonics

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives
Categories
dip and strike compass
Measuring dip and strike
sandstone classification header
Classification of sandstones
Calcite cemented subarkose, Proterozoic Altyn Fm. southern Alberta
Sandstones in thin section
poles to bedding great circles
Stereographic projection – poles to planes
froude-reynolds-antidunes-header-768x439-1
Fluid flow: Froude and Reynolds numbers
Stokes Law for particle settling in a schematic context of other fluid flow functions
Fluid flow: Stokes Law and particle settling
sedimentary-basins-distribution-1-768x711
Classification of sedimentary basins
Model are representational descriptions are written in different languages - diagrammatic, descriptive, mathematical, and conceptual. They commonly contain variables and dimensionless quantities that permit quantitative analysis of the physical systems the models represent.
Geological models
Recent Posts
alice wilson with hammer
Alice Wilson (1881-1964)
Madeleine Fritz in the field
Madeleine Fritz (1896 -1990)
Eunice-Foote-paper-title-1024x404
Eunice Foote (1819–1888)
Regina Fleszarowa
Regina Fleszarowa (1888-1969)
gertrude elles at the outcrop
Gertrude Lilian Elles (1872-1960)
Scroll to Top